Learning to Love Star Trek, Part 5: Where Many Trek Fans Have Gone Before
This week I watched an Original Series episode that something tells me might be popular among Trek fans: "Where No Man has Gone Before." This one involves the Enterprise encountering some electromagnetic force that damages the ship and shocks crew members Gary Mitchell, a long-time friend of Kirk, and Dr. Elizabeth Dehner, a psychiatrist. As a result of the shock, Gary begins evolving into a godlike being. He soon exhibits mischievous and even insidious behavior, so Kirk has to do something to neutralize the situation before Gary gets to the point at which he'll kill them all simply because they're a nuisance – a point that Spock explains Gary will inevitably reach. Spock also explains that the only possible solution to the problem seems to be to kill Gary before he becomes too powerful to handle. Kirk naturally rejects the idea of preeminently killing a friend.
To my knowledge, this was the first Star Trek episode to be filmed (except for the original rejected pilot with a different cast). With that in mind, the actors appear to be surprisingly comfortable in their roles. Spock and Kirk – the only characters that have major roles in the story and survive to see future episodes – are basically just as I remember seeing them in other episodes. William Shatner demonstrates authority when rebutting Dehner's admonition of his actions toward Gary, and Spock is as straightforward and objective as ever.
Gary Lockwood does a great job in the role of Gary Mitchell, too. He's both casual and menacing, calm and authoritative. His glare at Kirk through the bridge monitor is effectively unsettling. It was definitely the right move for his character to die in the end of this episode, but, based purely on his acting ability, I wish we could have seen more of what Lockwood was capable of in future episodes.
One strange character-related problem I noticed – and this isn’t related to the acting – is that Spock has a yellowish tint to his skin. I guess this was meant to make it more obvious that he's of an alien race, but it just makes him look jaundiced. It's not so yellow as to be continually distracting, though, so it's not a significant problem. Another thing that slightly annoyed me was Spock's explanation that Kirk beat him in chess because he played illogically. There's nothing wrong with this on its own, but we already saw a similar Kirk-versus-Spock chess scenario in one of the previous episodes. So, we've had essentially the same thing happen twice, and we're only three episodes into the series. Seems redundant to me, but maybe I'm being picky.
Story-wise, I thought "Where No Man has Gone Before" started off okay. It presents a difficult situation and offers two difficult options: kill a so-far innocent man before he kills you, or let him live and try to deal with his malevolence after it arises – at which point he will be an impossible foe. Naturally, Spock and Kirk represent these opposing options.

Kirk, your hair's messed up and your shirt's torn, but you pull off the look.
However, my problem with the story is that instead of having a real resolution, it sort of cheats to let its characters off the hook. The crew manages to get Gary down onto the planet they are orbiting before he's too powerful to resist them, but Gary does become too powerful for them, kills one crew member, and runs off with Dr. Dehner, who is beginning to exhibit the same powers. So, Kirk chases after them. When Kirk confronts them, he convinces Dehner to help him out. Dehner eventually accedes to Kirk's request, attacks Gary, and is killed, but she was able to distract him long enough for Kirk to shoot some giant rocks that come crashing down on Gary, killing him. This was too much of a cop-out for me. The only reason Kirk came out of this situation triumphant is that Dehner just so happened to acquire her powers at exactly the right time at which she can 1) still be won over by an earnest appeal and 2) put up some resistance to Gary. It seems to me that Kirk by all means should have been killed in such a scenario.
Also, none of the characters ended up having to make a tough decision. Sure, Kirk risks his life to go after Gary, but since he's the brave and bold hero of the show, this comes as no surprise at all. It would have been much more rewarding if Kirk had heeded Spock's advice from the beginning, killed Gary while he could, and then had to cope with making such a decision. Instead, he does hardly anything and survives by luck.
I'm still not feeling much for the characters at this point in the series. So far the episodes have been based almost entirely on them overcoming physical threats and very little on their personal feelings about the situations they are facing. I don't feel like they're being challenged on a personal level enough, and when they are challenged on a personal level (e.g. Kirk having to potentially kill a friend who's transforming into something else), they haven't had to make any tough decisions. Kirk just plays hero, and everything turns out okay. The argument could be made that Bones had a personal dilemma in episode 1, in which he was confronted with a creature that had taken the form of a woman he loved, but nothing comes out of it. Sure, there's that moment where he can't bring himself to kill the creature even though it's attacking Kirk, but there are no consequences to his inaction. It's not something he later has to deal with.
This was another episode that didn't do much to actually bother me, but it didn't draw me in, either. Like "Charlie X," it started off strong and devolved into a harrowing situation in which luck becomes the hero.
Next up: The Next Generation episode 1.3 - "Code of Honor."





Comments
Gary
I think you're being far too picky. This wasn't made in the 90s, it was made in the 60s. They were still experimenting with getting Spock's alien look just right. His yellowish look is a little distracting, but it was corrected later.
I don't understand the rest of your objections at all. Are you going to pick on every little plot device that might be considered "luck"? You might as well stop watching right now. Kirk resisted killing Gary because he held out hope that he could be contained (the same as he did for Charlie Evans). Only after he had killed Kelso did Kirk realize he was beyond that now. He went out to stop Gary, fully expecting not to survive the experience. Dehner acquired her powers at the same time as Gary. The difference was that she was a trained psychologist. THAT's why she was "won over by an earnest appeal".
I think all the stories you mention are very much about them confronting their personal feelings. The physical challengers are secondary in every case.
You really would have prefered Kirk say, "You're right Spock" and just killed Gary Mitchell halfway through the story? And then I suppose when Dehner began changing, kill her too? Then what? Would he have sat in his cabin sulking for the rest of the episode?
I think you're being far too
I think you're being far too picky. This wasn't made in the 90s, it was made in the 60s. They were still experimenting with getting Spock's alien look just right. His yellowish look is a little distracting, but it was corrected later.
As I said, this wasn't a major problem for me. It was just something I noticed.
Are you going to pick on every little plot device that might be considered "luck"?
Not all of them. Just the ones that the writers use to escape from corners they've backed themselves into.
Kirk resisted killing Gary because he held out hope that he could be contained (the same as he did for Charlie Evans). Only after he had killed Kelso did Kirk realize he was beyond that now. He went out to stop Gary, fully expecting not to survive the experience.
I realize that, but all this does is reinforce Kirk's heroism, which all viewers should already be convinced is there. None of this adds to his character.
I think all the stories you mention are very much about them confronting their personal feelings. The physical challengers are secondary in every case.
I think they start off that way, but then they turn to "Okay, how do we get the characters out of this situation." Kirk "deals with" Gary's death for about 5 seconds in the end when he notes in the Captain's log that he gave his life in the line of duty. That's it.
You really would have prefered Kirk say, "You're right Spock" and just killed Gary Mitchell halfway through the story? And then I suppose when Dehner began changing, kill her too? Then what? Would he have sat in his cabin sulking for the rest of the episode?
Yes! Think about it. That would have been the most dramatic, intense, and moving path the story could have possibly taken. And there's no reason we would need to watch them do nothing but sulk for the rest of the episode. They could have moved on to other adventures, dilemmas, etc., but during that time, Gary's death would be on their minds, affecting their actions.
Now, I do realize, of course, that this couldn't really have been done in the 1960s without alienating virtually every viewer. Plus, Star Trek is about hope, not dismay. But this episode doesn't really give us any conceivable hope, unless you would consider it to be the message: "Always be brave, and the situation will be orchestrated with such precision you'll come out alright no matter what (unless your a low-ranking officer)."
Keep in mind I'm trying to like the series, here. I just don't feel like it's giving me much to work with. The episodes are starting off strong, but then as they progress they trail into circumstances that are just too coincidentally in favor of the main characters. I didn't hate this episode, but these were some problems.
Where No Man Has Gone Before
While I think you're being a bit hard on this episode, your review is very good. I think your point that if Kirk had followed Spock's advice earlier in the story is well taken, I don't believe it would be terribly realistic for a few reasons. The first reason is that, if Kirk had just nodded and then followed the science officer's advice, it would have eliminated in a sense Kirk's real decision; he'd be letting Spock make the decision for him. The next reason is that, earlier in the episode, Dehner's point that Mitchell might become a better human was just as valid as Spock's. Even if we in the audience knew that trouble would soon come, Kirk didn't at that point. In fact, one could make the argument that Spock, early on in the episode, was being a bit paranoid, jumping to some fairly large conclusions based on a garbled transmission. One more reason why Kirk couldn't have killed Mitchell earlier was that, if he did that so early in the emergency, do you really think the rest of the crew would really be able to trust him? If he immediately killed someone before more facts were known, no one on the crew would be willing to admit that they even had a runny nose.
You are correct in a sense that the ending is a bit of a cheat, but this is a TV series, not a film. The dramatic thing would have been for Kirk to sacrifice himself the kill Mitchell (incidentally, the action packed ending was written specifically by Roddenberry to sell the series. Westerns were big in the '60s; Roddenberry felt this Western-type brawl would help Trek get the nod.) However, the series can't kill its main character in its pilot (even Lost didn't do that). I'm willing to grant the episode this plot point.
One thing that your reviews have made me notice something that I hadn't noticed before: these early episodes are much more plot driven than I had realized. Trust me, however, from "The Naked Time" through "Amok Time", "Journey to Babel," and "The Empath" just to name a few, this series does become much more character driven. Leonard Nimoy has always said that one of the things that attracted him to the series was the opportunity to play a character with a deep internal life.
As a closing, you'll come to see that this episode is one of the series' best episodes concerning absolute power. Keep going.... :-)
Live Long and Prosper
Good points
Thanks Eric. You actually make some good points pertaining to my criticism of Kirk's actions. Perhaps you're right that Kirk couldn't have killed him, even outside of the fact that it would have been too shocking for its audiences.
I see your point about the plot cheat, too, but I still feel that it was a bit too contrived to be believable. TV shows do stuff like that all the time, as you mentioned, but here I felt like everything fell too coincidentally, too perfectly into place to ensure Kirk's survival.
I really am looking forward to the more character-heavy episodes.
Good points
I can't wait until you see "The Naked Time" or "The City on the Edge of Forever." "City" is usually regarded as TOS's best episode, and it forces Kirk into one of the hardest choices he will make in his life!
Live Long and Prosper
First of all, I typed in
First of all, I typed in "City on the Edge of Forever" to see where it falls in the series, and this was what it took me to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_on_the_edge_of_forever. What an abomination.
Second: Jeez, I don't want to wait that long to get to it! Looking forward to it, though.
Look at this....
This is the real link :-). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_City_on_the_Edge_of_Forever
Live Long and Prosper
Yeah, I found it immediately
Yeah, I found it immediately after. I just how to point out the absurdity of the other link being the default page for that search.
The pilot NBC wanted
As I was reading your review, I was thinking the same thing as Atoz 77. It appears you are looking at this episode as you would one made in 2010, not one from 1966. However, that subject has already been addressed.
As for this story, we know early on that Gary is going to have to die. Kirk’s personal struggle is only normal. It seems a little odd that a non-violent Vulcan would encourage cold-blooded murder, even if it does seem logical. Also, this isn’t the only time Spock suggests killing something. I feel it was a good, exciting adventure and it had an intelligent plot, compared to most other sci-fi shows at the time.
According to Wikipedia: “Gene Roddenberry originally conceived Spock's skin color to be red…[but] an early make-up test showed that the red color merely appeared as black on black-and-white televisions. Since most televisions in the '60s were still black-and-white, the idea was dropped.”
The phaser rifle was never used again after this episode. I can’t find any references to this, but I seem to remember Roddenberry felt it wasn’t believable, because the weapon looked like something out of “Flash Gordon.”
Very interesting stuff.
Very interesting stuff. Yeah, I thought the phaser rifle looked a little silly, but that's kind of an unfair point to make, since virtually all sci-fi weaponry pre-1970s looks silly.
Post new comment